Though few would question the popularity of Raiders of the
Lost Ark, no academic worth his salt, ever dared to say the movie
was more than a Hollywood fantasy, either. So when respected
British author Graham Hancock announced to the world in 1992 that
he had actually tracked the legendary Ark of the Covenant of Old
Testament fame to a modern-day resting place in Ethiopia, serious
eyebrows everywhere twitched upward. Nevertheless, objective
readers of his monumental volume The Sign and the Seal, on both
sides of the Atlantic, soon realized that Hancock's case,
incredible though it seemed, was not to be easily dismissed. The
exhaustively researched work went on to enjoy widespread critical
acclaim, to become a best-seller in both America and the U.K. as
well as to become the subject of several television specials.
Hancock's writing and journalistic skills had been honed
during stints as a war correspondent in Africa for The Economist
and The London Sunday Times. Winner of an honorable mention for
the H.L. Mencken Award (The Lords of Poverty, 1990), he also
authored African Ark: Peoples of the Horn, and Ethiopia: The
Challenge of Hunger. In The Sign And The Seal, Hancock was
credited by The Guardian with having invented a new genre, an
intellectual whodunit by a do-it-yourself sleuth....
Apparently though, the success of The Sign and the Seal has
only whetted the writer's appetite for establishment chagrin. In
his latest book Hancock is out for even bigger game. In fact,
Fingerprints of the Gods seeks nothing less than to overthrow the
cherished doctrine taught in classrooms worldwide, that
civilization was born roughly 5,000 years ago. Anything earlier,
we are told, was strictly primitive. In one of the most
comprehensive efforts on the subject ever, over 600 pages of
meticulous research, Hancock presents breakthrough evidence of a
forgotten epoch in human history which preceded by thousands of
years the presently acknowledged cradles of civilization in
Egypt, Mesopotamia and the Far East. Moreover, he argues, this
same lost culture was not only highly advanced but
technologically proficient and was destroyed more than 12,000
years ago by the global cataclysm which brought the ice age to
its sudden and dramatic conclusion.
Just released in the U.S., Fingerprints of the Gods (Crown,
608 pp.), seeks to duplicate early successes in Great Britain
where by mid-June it had already enjoyed considerable critical
praise and six straight weeks as the number-one bestseller.
Kirkus Reviews called it a fancy piece of historical sleuthing,
breathless, but intriguing and entertaining and sturdy enough to
give a long pause for thought.
In America to promote Fingerprints, Hancock was at his hotel
room in Washington, D.C. when Atlantis Rising caught up with him.
With just two days of the tour behind him, it was still too early
to estimate how the book would do here, but already he was
enjoying the kind of favorable media attention which helped to
make The Sign and the Seal an American hit. Interviewers, he
felt, were generally positive and open to his ideas. While the
reception among academics has been something less than cordial,
that was to be expected. One of the reasons the book is so long,
he explained, is because I've really tried to document everything
very thoroughly, so that the academics have to deal with the
evidence, rather than me as an individual, or with what, they
like to think, are rather vague wishy-washy ideas. I've tried to
nail it all down to hard fact as far as possible.
Nailing down the facts took Hancock on a worldwide odyssey
which included stops in Peru, Mexico, and Egypt. Among the many
intriguing mysteries which the author was determined fully to
investigate were:
- Ancient maps showing precise knowledge of the actual
coastline of Antarctica, notwithstanding the fact that
the location has been buried under thousands of feet of
ice for many millennia.
- Stone building technology, beyond our present capacity to
duplicate, in Central and South America, as well as
Egypt.
- Sophisticated archeo-astronomical alignments at ancient
sites all over the world.
- Evidence of comprehensive ancient knowledge of the
25,776-year precession of the equinoxes (unmistakably
encoded into ancient mythology and building sites, even
though the phenomenon would have taken, at a minimum,
many generations of systematic observation to detect, and
which conventional scholarship tells us was not
discovered until the Greek philosopher Hipparchus in
about 150 B.C.).
- Water erosion of the Great Sphinx dating it to before the
coming of desert conditions to the Giza plateau (as
researched by American scholar John Anthony West and
geologist Robert Schoch).
- Evidence that the monuments of the Giza plateau were
built in alignment with the belt of Orion at circa.
10,500 B.C. (as demonstrated by Belgian engineer Robert
Bauval).
Unfettered as he is by the constraints under which many
so-called specialists operate, Hancock sees himself uniquely
qualified to undertake such a far-reaching study. One of the
problems with academics, and particularly academic historians, he
insists, is they have a very narrow focus. And as a result they
are very myopic.
Hancock is downright contemptuous of organized Egyptology,
which he places in the particularly short-sighted category.
There's a rigid paradigm of Egyptian history, he complains, which
seems to function as a kind of filter on knowledge and which
stops Egyptologists, as a profession, from being even the
remotest bit open to any other possibilities at all. In Hancock's
view Egyptologists tend to behave like priests in a very narrow
religion, dogmatically and irrationally, if not superstitiously.
A few hundred years ago they would have burned people like me and
John West at the stake, he laughs.
Such illogical zealotry Hancock fears stands in the way of the
public's right to know about what could be one of the most
significant discoveries ever made in the Great Pyramid. In 1993,
the German inventor Rudolph Gantenbrink sent a robot with a
television camera up a narrow shaft from the Queen's chamber and
discovered what appears to be a door with iron handles. That
door, Hancock suspects, might lead to the legendary hall of
records of the ancient Egyptians. But whatever is behind it, he
feels it must be properly investigated. So far, though, there has
been no official action, at least not a public one. Citing
episodes personally witnessed, he protests you have Egyptologists
saying there is no point in looking to see if there's anything
behind that slab', they call it a slab', they won't call it a
door, because we know there's not another chamber inside the
great pyramid. The attitude infuriates Hancock, I wonder how they
know that, in this 6-million-ton monument which has got room for
3,000 chambers the same size as the king's chamber. How do they
have the temerity and the nerve to suggest that there's no point
in looking?
The tantalizing promise of that door has led Hancock to
speculate that the builders may have purposely arranged things to
require technology of ultimate explorers. Nobody could get in
there unless they had a certain level of technology. And he
points out that even a hundred years ago we didn't have the means
to do it. In the last 20 years the technology has been developed
and now the shaft has been explored, and lo and behold; at the
end is a door with handles. It's like an invitation, an
invitation to come on in, look inside, when you're ready.
Hancock is far from sanguine about official intentions. If
that door ever does get open, probably there will be no public
access at all to what happens. He would like to see an
international team present, but suspects that, instead, what
we're going to get is a narrow elite group of Egyptologists who
will strictly control information about what happens. In fact, he
thinks it's possible that they've even been in there already. The
Queen's chamber was suspiciously closed for more than nine months
after Gantenbrink made his discovery. The story was given out
that they were cleaning the graffiti off the walls but the
graffiti was never cleaned off. I wonder what they were doing in
there those nine months. There's what really makes me angry, that
this narrow group of scholars control knowledge of what is at the
end of the day the legacy of the whole of mankind.
Gantenbrink's door is not the only beckoning portal on the
Giza plateau. Hancock is equally interested in the chamber which
John Anthony West and Robert Schoch, in the course of
investigating the weathering of the Sphinx, detected, by seismic
methods, beneath the paws. Either location might prove to be the
site of the hall of records. In both cases, the authorities have
resisted all efforts at further investigation.
Hancock believes the entire Giza site was constructed after
the crust of the earth had stabilized following a 30-degree
crustal displacement which destroyed most of the high
civilization then standing. According to Rand and Rose Flem-Ath's
When the Sky Fell, upon which Hancock relies, that displacement
had moved an entire continent from temperate zones to the south
pole where it was soon buried under mountains of ice. This, he
believes, is the real story of the end of Plato's Atlantis, but
the A word is not mentioned until very late. I see no point in
giving a hostile establishment a stick to beat me with, he
offers. It's purely a matter of tactics.
The Giza complex was built, Hancock speculates, as part of an
effort to remap and reorient civilization. For that reason he
believes the 10,500 B.C. date (demonstrated by Bauval) to be
especially important. The pyramids are a part of saying this is
where it stopped. That's why the perfect alignment, for example,
to due north, of the Great Pyramid is extremely interesting,
because they obviously would have had a new north at that time.
Despite a determination to stick with the hard evidence,
Hancock is not uncomfortable with the knowledge that his work is
serving to corroborate the claims of many intuitives and mystics.
On the contrary, he believes, that the (clairvoyant ability) of
human beings is another one of those latent faculties which
modern rational science simply refuses to recognize. I think
we're a much more mysterious species than we give ourselves
credit for. Our whole cultural conditioning is to deny those
elements of intuition and mystery in ourselves. But all the
indications are that these are, in fact, vital faculties in human
beings, and I suspect that the civilization that was destroyed,
although technologically advanced, was much more spiritually
advanced than we are today.
Such knowledge, he believes, is part of the legacy of the
ancients which we must strive to recover. What comes across again
and again, particularly from documents like the ancient Egyptian
Pyramid texts, which I see as containing the legacy of knowledge
and ideas from this lost civilization, is a kind of science of
immortality, a quest for the immortality of the soul. I feeling
that immortality may not be guaranteed to all and everybody
simply by being born. It may be something that has to be worked
for. Something that results from the focused power of the mind.
The real purpose of the pyramids, he suggests, may be to teach us
how to achieve immortality. But before we can understand, we must
recover from the ancient amnesia.
Hancock believes we are a species with amnesia. I think we
show all the signs that there's a traumatic episode in our past,
which is so horrible that we cannot somehow bring ourselves to
recognize it. Just as the victim suffering from amnesia as a
result of some terrible episode fears awakening memory of that
trauma and tries to avoid it, so we have done collectively. The
amnesia victim is, of course, forced to return to the source of
his pain and, if you wish to move forward and continue to develop
as an individual you have to overcome it. You have to confront
it, deal with it, see it face to face, realize what it means, get
over it, and get on with your life. That is what society needs to
be doing.
In the institutional resistance to considering ancient
achievement, Hancock sees a subconscious pattern based on fear.
There's a huge impulse to deny all of this, because suddenly all
the foundations get knocked out from under you and you find
yourself swimming loosely in space without any points of
reference anymore. The process needn't be so threatening though.
If we can go through that difficult experience and come out on
the other side, I think we'll all emerge better from it. I'm more
and more convinced that the reason we are so messed up and
confused and totally disturbed as a species at the end of the
20th century is because of this, because we've forgotten our
past.
If it is true that those who cannot learn from history are
doomed to repeat it, then there are lessons in our past which can
be ignored only at our peril. Clearly written into the mythology
of many societies are stories of cataclysmic destruction. Hancock
cites the work of Giorgio de Santillana, an authority on the
history of science at M.I.T. In his book Hamlet's Mill,
Santillana hypothesized an advanced scientific knowledge was
encoded into ancient myth. Hancock points out, Once you accept
that mythology may have originated with highly advanced people,
then you have to start listening to what the myths are saying.
What the myths are saying, he believes, is that a great cataclysm
struck the world and destroyed an advanced civilization and a
golden age of mankind. And the bad cataclysm is a recurrent
feature in the life of the Earth and will return. The messages
from many ancient sources, including the Bible, point to a
recurrence of such a cataclysm in our lifetime. Notwithstanding
such views, Hancock insists he is not a prophet of doom. His
point is, We've received a legacy of extraordinary knowledge from
the past, and the time has come for us to stop dismissing it.
Rather, we must recapture that heritage, learn what we can from
it, because there is vitally important information in it.
The stakes couldn't be higher. I'm convinced that we're locked
today in a battle of ideas, he says. I think it's desperately
important that the ideas that will lead to a recovery of our
memory as a species triumph. And therefore we have to be strong,
we have to be eloquent, and argue clearly and coherently. We have
to see what our opponents are going to do, how they are going to
try to get at us. And the dirty tricks that they are going to try
and play. We have to fight them on their own ground.
Hancock's next book will be a collaboration with Robert Bauval
in which he plans not only to complete the decoding of the
archeo-astronomy of the Giza plateau, but also to protest the way
official Egyptology has behaved. In the process, Hancock promises
to air some of the establishment's dirty linen, to look behind
the scenes at what they've been doing, how research has been
hindered, misled and misguided by a narrow group of scholars
protecting their own interests at the cost of the rest of
humanity. We have uncovered a really serious scandal in
Egyptology which, once it's brought out into public view, will
make it impossible for this group of scholars, who have
controlled Giza for the last 20 years, to have any credibility at
all.
In the meantime Fingerprints of the Gods promises to expose
|