From October 2-6, 1996, the International
Association for New Science (IANS) presented its Seventh Annual
Forum on New Science in Denver, Colorado. The 5-day conference
included a roster of speakers and workshop leaders that featured
such notables as Zecharia Sitchin, Dr. John Lilly, P.M.H.
Atwater, Courtney Brown, William Tiller, as well as numerous
other researchers in the fields of alternative science and
paranormal phenomena.
Highlights of the conference included P.M.H.
Atwater, who presented lectures detailing her decades of research
into the near-death experience, in particular the brain shift or
transformations of consciousness, personality, and physiology
that often follow the occurrence of this phenomenon. The subject
of a follow-on workshop was future memory, under which people,
while fully awake, experience a full-sense vision of an event or
interaction that subsequently, sometimes weeks or even month
later, happens to them.
Courtney Brown, author of the recent book
Cosmic Voyage, provided a report of team findings concerning
extraterrestrial civilizations and activities gleaned from the
application of remote viewing techniques. Dr. John Lilly,
renowned for his work involving dolphins, reviewed this work and
his later investigations into altered states of consciousness.
One of the senior statesmen of New Science, he was honored at the
conference for his pioneering efforts. Stanford Professor William
Tiller presented the evidence of his research for the ability of
the subtle energy of human intentionality to effectuate
measurable changes in physical and physiological systems. Dr.
Nick Begich, Jr. discussed the wide-ranging impacts of the
federal government's new ground-based Star Wars weapon in Alaska
on human health and behavior, and weather patterns.
The last day of the conference was devoted to
the works of author/researcher Zecharia Sitchin on the
extraterrestial origins of humankind. Sitchin himself delivered
an overview of the evidence based on ancient writings of a
superior race from another planet who once inhabited our world
and planted the genetic seed that resulted in our own species.
Professor of Geology Madeleine Briskin, among six speakers who
followed, spoke of the scientific evidence corroborating
Sitchin's report of an ancient astronomical 432,000-year cycle
that is responsible for various earth dynamics and possibly
supportive of the existence of another planet in our solar
system.
IANS, the forum sponsor, is a non-profit
organization dedicated to furthering education and research in
the many areas of human experience and curiosity that are worthy
of serious investigation but which have been overlooked by
traditional science. In addition to holding its annual symposium,
IANS has sponsored conferences dealing specifically with New
Energy, UFO Research, and New Agriculture, Gardening, and
Housing. For information on membership and future activities,
IANS may be contacted at 1304 South College Avenue, Fort Collins,
Colorado 80524, (970) 482-3731, Fax: (970) 482-3120. Its e-mail
address is galactic@fortnet.org.
AUSTRALIAN ROCK ART COULD UPSET ESTABLISHED
SCENARIO FOR HUMAN ORIGINS
The orthodox chronology for human origins on
planet earth, usually cited to rule out the existence of
pre-ice-age civilizations, has been dealt yet another blow. The
latest challenge comes from Australia, where archeologists have
found rock art dating to 75,000 years ago. Indeed, stone tools
and other associated evidence suggest Australia had human
inhabitants as much as 176,000 years ago.
A team from the Australian Museum and the
University of Wolongong have discovered, in the tropical
northwest, thousands of dot-like indentations engraved on a group
of monoliths in the unmistakable image of a kangaroo. The
findings will be published in the prestigious British
archeological journal Antiquity in December.
Contradicting prevailing theories postulating
that Australia was first inhabited 60,000 years ago the new data
suggests that human habitation may be at least twice that age. If
the new findings are confirmed, the conventional notion that Homo
Sapiens did not emerge from Africa until about 100,000 years ago
will have to give way to a scenario which has them capable of
crossing large bodies of water many thousands of years earlier.
As archeologist Richard Fullagar puts it, It
opens up a whole plethora of questions.
SPARKS FLY DURING RETURN TO THE SOURCE
CONFERENCE AT U.D.
If, as many believe, the source of life is
fire, then the Return to the Source conference at the University
of Delaware during the last weekend in September fulfilled its
promise. There was certainly plenty of heat. And, as for light,
there was no shortage of that either.
Scheduled speakers at the University's Clayton
Conference Center were among today's most distinguished
challengers of the academic paradigm, especially in the realm of
ancient origins. Included were the likes of John Anthony West,
Graham Hancock, Robert Bauval, Robert Schoch, Rand Flem-Ath,
Colin Wilson and Paul Roberts. Not surprisingly, attendees came
to the first symposium of the Society for Scientific Exploration
expecting to be inundated with hard-to-get information and
insight. They were not disappointed, but few could have
anticipated the fireworks which were to explode over the current
and controversial research at the Great Sphinx in Egypt from
which West, Hancock and Bauval, authors of much of the new
research indicating a much greater antiquity for the Sphinx and
much greater astronomical wisdom than previously supposed, have
been summarily excluded (as reported in the previous issue of
Atlantis Rising and other media).
The high drama began Friday night (actually
early Saturday morning) when Hancock and Bauval were guests on
the nationally syndicated Art Bell radio show. Space researcher
Richard Hoagland called in to announce that he had been invited
to attend the opening, later in the year, of newly found chambers
beneath the Sphinx, whereupon Hancock and Bauval proceeded to
state in the most stinging terms just how they felt about the
exploration and the people doing it. Singled out for intense
criticism were the U.S.-based Schor Foundation, which is funding
the work, and Zahi Hawass, the Egyptian Antiquities Director for
the Giza Plain.
Later on Saturday, in the symposium, during the
question and answer session following their remarks both Bauval
and Hancock announced that after the radio show they had been
asked to meet with the Schor Foundation in New York the following
Monday to discuss their differences. Whereupon a representative
of the Schor Foundation who was attending the conference, Joe
Jahoda, took the microphone to defend the Foundation and its
much-criticized confidential arrangements with Egyptian
authorities.
According to Jahoda, nothing underhanded was
going on. While suggesting that researchers were indeed making
many findings confirmatory of assertions made by Hancock and
Bauval, as well as John Anthony West and geologist Robert Schoch,
Jahoda said the foundation had simply contracted with the
Egyptian antiquities bureaucracy to keep its findings
confidential until approval had been obtained from those
authorities. Hancock responded that anything less than full
public disclosure of the facts was unacceptable. Both Hancock and
Bauval made it clear that they did not trust the antiquities
authorities.
As a case in point Bauval cited German engineer
Rudolf Gantenbrink's recent robotic exploration of the ascending
shaft from the Queen's chamber which revealed a hitherto unknown
door with metal handles, an undertaking which Bauval asserted had
been blocked for 150 years by the obstinacy of the authorities.
Gantenbrink himself had been restrained by a secrecy contract but
had inadvertently leaked news of his discovery to Bauval who had
released it. Information is being sat on, Bauval lamented. And,
Hancock interjected, in a pointed reference to the Schor tactics,
If something is wrong, we don't have to accept it. If we do, we
are participants in the wrong.
In an effort to be conciliatory, Bauval
complimented Jahoda on his honesty and invited him to join them
on the stage. Jahoda accepted. Bauval, though, went on to
complain that Zahi Hawass was treating the site like his own
personal property. Various members of the audience began to chime
in with critical stories of Hawass, such as, that he was
interested only in tourism, that he had denied the academic
credential of Robert Schoch (a tenured professor at Boston
University) and that he had publicly slandered his other
opponents. The temperature in the room seemed to be rising, but
it would get warmer.
Regarding the meeting set for Hancock and
Bauval with the Schor group, someone wanted to know what about
John West? To which Hancock replied, Yes, what about John West? a
cry then echoed by many in the audience. Whereupon John West
himself appeared and joined the group on stage. Joking that he
had been away on another planet, West said he had missed the fact
that someone was following up on his research at the Sphinx and
had not invited him. He did concede that, Hawass has a difficult
job, but added, so does Saddam Hussein. The crowd roared with
laughter.
We are not going to take Hawass anymore, Bauval
declared and described how he personally had been threatened with
bodily harm by Hawass. Quoting one essentially unprintable remark
which he said he had on good authority, Bauval made it clear,
Hawass apparently intended him a very dire fate indeed.
By now Jahoda was looking quite uncomfortable
but was, nevertheless, sticking to his guns. Whatever remarks had
been made by Hawass, he saw as essentially rhetorical, Just an
Egyptian letting you know he was mad.
The episode then drew to a rapid conclusion
when conference organizer Brenda Dunn broke in to say the
University was insisting the Conference Center be cleared. There,
pending the Monday meeting, the matter was rested.
As Atlantis Rising goes to press, the outcome
of that meeting has not been released publicly but sources in
both camps report that its results were inconclusive. An uneasy
truce has been reached, says one source.
In the meantime, work continues at the Sphinx
and Atlantis Rising has been told that some kind of penetration,
perhaps with a camera through a drill hole, of what could be the
fabled Lost Hall of Records could occur as early as late October.
A possible live NBC telecast of the complete opening of the
chamber may follow by the end of the year or perhaps early in
1997. As to what role may yet be played in all of this by John
Anthony West, Graham Hancock or Robert Bauval, stay tuned.
|